The case involves alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 read with Section 120B of the IPC, and Sections ...
The Tribunal held that notices under section 153C issued without independent satisfaction by the AO are invalid, quashing the ...
The order holds that the company commenced operations before filing the mandatory INC-20A form, constituting a 293-day delay.
The company failed to comply with statutory charge registration requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, attracting ...
The company and its officer were penalized for failing to transfer acquired assets into the company’s name, violating Section ...
ITAT Delhi held that granting blanket 153D approval without independent examination vitiates assessments. approvals under ...
The ROC Chennai penalized a company and its directors for failing to disclose PAN and email IDs of allottees in Form PAS-3.
The Court set aside notices issued manually by the JAO, holding that reassessment and issuance of Section 148 notices must ...
The company and officers were penalized for errors in PAS-3 e-form filing during loan-to-equity conversion, highlighting the ...
Bombay High Court held that Brand Acquisition Agreement in respect of trademark –‘Crocin’ between parties is an agreement to Sale and such sale is not a sale within the State of Maharashtra hence not ...
The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officers communication did not consider the assessees objections but only reiterated the basis of reopening. As the objections were not disposed of through a ...
The Court held that pending SLP does not bar enforcement of binding High Court precedent. The petitioner’s refund of ₹65 lakh for unutilized IGST was ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback