Is the NKJV based on the Textus Receptus or the Critical Text?
Aug 29, 2008 · Puritan Board Senior. Here is part of the Free Reformed Study Committee on the NKJV and the TR in general: Among all the major new translations (smaller efforts by Jay Green and others aside) since the end of the nineteenth century, the New King James Version is the only version that explicitly holds to the Textus Receptus as its base. The 1990 ...
Joel Beeke: King James Version Study Bible | The Puritan Board
Puritan Board Junior. Oct 19, 2012. #1. From Joel Beeke's site (post: King James Version Study Bible): Reformation Heritage Books is excited to announce the planned publication of a new study Bible. Amid the vast array of study Bibles written in the past century, there has not been a single Study Bible using the beloved and trusted King James ...
New King James Or NIV? - The Puritan Board
Puritan Board Graduate. Jan 12, 2015. #5. Edward said: Unless its an original version of the NIV, it is only suitable for burning. I'd vote for the NKJV over the ESV, but ESV is what we've standardized on at church, so it's what I'm currently using. Either NKJV or ESV would be suitable for your purposes.
KJV 2016 Version Published - The Puritan Board
Jan 13, 2016 · The translators of the King James Version 2016 believe that the King James Version of 1611-1900 is an accurate translation of the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and is thus by default, the words of God in English. Unfortunately for the KJV, the English language is constantly developing and many word meanings today vastly differ from the ...
21st Century King James Version (KJ21) | The Puritan Board
Sep 7, 2006 · The text of the 21st Century King James Version (KJ21), maybe quoted in any form (written, visual, electronic, or audio) up to and inclusive of two hundred (200) verses without prior written permission of the publisher, provided that the verses quoted do not account for more than 40 percent of the work in which they are quoted, and provided ...
KJV Update Project - The Puritan Board
Mar 28, 2023 · The New King James Version (NKJV) in fact is not a strict update of the KJV into contemporary English, for it contains new translation from the original languages and significantly differs in meaning from the KJV in many places (e.g. Genesis 49:6, 2 Kings 23:29, Job 17:6, Psalm 139:16, Isaiah 9:3, Matthew 6:13).
Why choose the NKJV over the ESV (or vice-versa)
Puritan Board Junior. Oct 1, 2009. #1. I was asked today why someone would choose the NKJV over the ESV. They were wondering because both sound "KJVish", are both literal, and even though the NT uses different texts the NKJV makes up for this in the footnotes. I said I wasn't exactly sure why some people choose one over the other (I gave some ...
Why do Reformers like the King James version rather ... - The …
Aug 16, 2012 · I should also add: Geneva Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The annotations which are an important part of the Geneva Bible were Calvinist and Puritan in character, and as such they were disliked by the ruling pro-government Anglicans of the Church of England, as well as King James I, who commissioned the "Authorized Version", or King ...
Updated American Standard Version (UASV) 2021 - The Puritan …
Dec 6, 2021 · New King James Version--- I would personally like to see a MINOR and I mean MINOR revision to help improve some of its renderings of certain words to better reflect the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek a bit more closely (examples: "power" to "authority" in certain contexts in the Gospels, etc.) This would be a great translation to have due ...
Is the KJV Bible copyrighted? | The Puritan Board
Puritan Board Doctor. Jun 22, 2018. #2. Nathan, technically, the Queen of England holds the copyright to the KJV. I have seen some books where the author acknowledges this fact, but they are few and far between. Practically speaking, very …